December 23, 2024 4:42 am

The premier news source for Snohomish County

County Council adopts four ordinances to ease housing supply crisis

EVERETT—The Snohomish County Council on Wednesday, August 14, at a Public Hearing, adopted four ordinances introduced by Councilmember Nate Nehring focused on increasing the available supply of housing and addressing housing affordability challenges. The suite of ordinances continues the efforts initiated by the “Opening Doors to Home Ownership” housing panel held at the Council’s Planning and Community Development Committee.

Nate Nehring
Nate Nehring

“The lack of available housing is a major driver of the cost of housing and the challenge many families face in affording a home,” said Councilmember Nehring. “Home ownership is critical for economic mobility and security. These ordinances will help increase the supply of housing and put home ownership within reach for more of our families, friends, and neighbors.”

The four ordinances address various county-level regulations that reduce the amount of housing that can be built on parcels within unincorporated Snohomish County. A brief description of each ordinance and links to more information can be found below. All four of Councilmember Nehring’s ordinances received positive recommendations from the Snohomish County Planning Commission and County Executive.

The first change, Ordinance 24-058, amends county regulations related to lot size averaging. The ordinance reduces minimum lot widths in urban zones utilizing lot size averaging, simplifies open space requirements, and eliminates unnecessary provisions which conflict with the health code.

The second proposal, Ordinance 24-059, creates more flexibility within parking regulations. These changes will allow more cottage-like parking arrangements within single family developments and increase the number of units that can feasibly be built in these developments.

The third piece of legislation, Ordinance 24-060, reduces minimum lot size requirements in the county’s low density multiple residential zone and multiple residential zone. Within these zones, homes can be a combination of detached homes on small lots, townhomes, and apartments. Reducing minimum lot sizes will allow for more of these parcels to be developed more efficiently. The ordinance and staff report can be found at this link.

The final ordinance adopted today was Ordinance 24-061. This code change creates more flexibility for the subdivision of duplexes and creates consistency within the regulations with other similar housing types. Duplexes can be a great option for first-time home buyers or individuals looking to downsize.

The four ordinances will now go to County Executive Dave Somers for consideration.


SOURCE: Office of County Councilman Nate Nehring

4 Responses

  1. IOW, downsize everything in order to increase housing supply. More units at a cost in terms of space/livability perhaps, but what can you do with a limited resource like land? Sad.

  2. Overpopulating an already over populated 7 sq mi. city is foolish. It also undermines and robs the previous Lynnwood residents and land owners of the reason they may have settled in Lynnwood to begin with. 25 years ago this was a nice quiet single family residential area. Im personally dealing with neighboring houses now that have been divided into multi rentals with multiple electric meters in one home. Neighboring homes which run Adult Family Care and other business’s. There is no street parking and constant 24hr traffic in what was a peaceful neighborhood. As your council is trying to raise taxs for that Sound Transit money laundering failure, your doing at the expense of Lynnwood resident land owners. I dont want to have to sell and move to try to find another Lynnwood as I feel its unfair. Signed enough is enough.

  3. Fix one problem just to create numerous new ones? So, add more congestion to already congested roads, over populate schools so the quality drops, reduce propery values for single home lots, drive out our beautiful wildlife. Brilliant solution, glad we pay people to think so narrow minded.

  4. Re: Ord. 24-058

    Summary Includes: “simplifies open space requirements”

    Hopefully, this does not mean removing environmental issues AND tree requirements.
    ???

    Thank you.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tell Us What You Think

This poll is no longer accepting votes

If you are IAM member, will you vote to approve the October 19 tentative agreement with Boeing? Poll ends 11:59 p.m., Oct 22, 2024.
VoteResults

    Join Our Mailing List

    Verified by MonsterInsights