SAN FRANCISCO, Calif., December 4, 2022—Matt Taibbi, under the blessing of Twitter CEO Elon Musk, released a plethora of emails involving Twitter employees suppressing the October 2020 article by the New York Post regarding then-Vice President Joe Biden’s son’s, Hunter Biden, abandoned laptop containing tens of thousands of emails alleging corrupt business dealings between the pair in Ukraine and China.
President Donald J Trump’s campaign tried to turn the bombshell reveal into an October surprise but the story failed to gain widespread traction due to social media platforms Twitter and Facebook suppressing the story agreeing with Obama/Biden-backed intelligence officials claims of it being a “Russian Disinformation” campaign.
Twitter CEO Elon Musk took to the platform on Friday to announce the truth behind the Hunter Biden story suppression by Twitter to be published on the social media site at 5 p.m. Eastern Time.
What really happened with the Hunter Biden story suppression by Twitter will be published on Twitter at 5pm ET!
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 2, 2022
In October, 2020, the New York Post released a story titled Smoking-gun email reveals how Hunter Biden introduced Ukrainian businessman to VP dad that revealed President Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, introduced the then-Vice President to a top adivisor—Vadym Pozharskyi—at the Ukrainian energy firm Burisma, less than a year before VP Joe Biden urged government officials in Ukraine to fire Ukrainian Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin who was investigating the company. Hunter Biden was serving on the Board of Burisma during the investigation making $50,000 per month.
The Biden campaign denied that the then-vice president had any meeting with Pozharskyi. During the 2020 campaign, Biden denied speaking with his son Hunter Biden about his business dealings at least eight times and in the First Presidential Debate on September 29, 2020, asserted that he and Hunter “never discussed” Hunter’s business dealings. Yet, the emails obtained by the New York Post tells a different story.
Twitter suppressed the circulation of this story, preventing sharing—both tweets and direct messaging—and flagging it as going against Twitter’s “hacking policy.”
21. Strom’s note returned the answer that the laptop story had been removed for violation of the company’s “hacked materials” policy: https://t.co/EdTa2xbXn1 pic.twitter.com/KQFRiKYKkb
— Matt Taibbi (@mtaibbi) December 3, 2022
Since Musk’s $44 billion takeover of the social media platform, he has been teasing citizens that he would reveal what took place beneath the curtains in an effort to transform his newly acquired Twitter into an arena that protects the First Amendment and free speech.
Around the time Musk tweeted the live feed would air; he followed up with a tweet saying “we’re double checking some facts” and would start live tweeting in 40 minutes.
The Twitter Files: The Reveal
About two hours after the live twitter feed was promised to air, Musk tweeted a link to author Matt Taibbi’s Twitter account who began the reveal. According to New York Magazine, Taibbi is “one of the most celebrated investigative journalists of his generation” and wrote for the Rolling Stone where he won a National Magazine Award. No longer affiliated with the Rolling Stone, Taibbi’s Substack newsletter, TK News, has more than 30,000 paying subscribers.
When it comes to politics, Taibbi is a “run-of-the-mill, old-school ACLU liberal,” who admires Bernie Sanders, according to the New York Magazine.
Below is Taibbi’s account of The Twitter Files in its entirety.
“What you’re about to read is the first installment in a series, based upon thousands of internal documents obtained by sources at Twitter.
“The ‘Twitter Files’ tell an incredible story from inside one of the world’s largest and most influential social media platforms. It is a Frankensteinian tale of a human-built mechanism grown out the control of its designer.
“Twitter in its conception was a brilliant tool for enabling instant mass communication, making a true real-time global conversation possible for the first time.
“In an early conception, Twitter more than lived up to its mission statement, giving people ‘the power to create and share ideas and information instantly, without barriers.’
“As time progressed, however, the company was slowly forced to add those barriers. Some of the first tools for controlling speech were designed to combat the likes of spam and financial fraudsters.
“Slowly, over time, Twitter staff and executives began to find more and more uses for these tools. Outsiders began petitioning the company to manipulate speech as well: first a little, then more often, then constantly.
“By 2020, requests from connected actors to delete tweets were routine. One executive would write to another: “More to review from the Biden team.” The reply would come back: ‘Handled.’
“Celebrities and unknowns alike could be removed or reviewed at the behest of a political party:
“Both parties had access to these tools. For instance, in 2020, requests from both the Trump White House and the Biden campaign were received and honored. However:
“This system wasn’t balanced. It was based on contacts. Because Twitter was and is overwhelmingly staffed by people of one political orientation, there were more channels, more ways to complain, open to the left (well, Democrats) than the right. Twitter Profile: Summary • OpenSecrets
“The resulting slant in content moderation decisions is visible in the documents you’re about to read. However, it’s also the assessment of multiple current and former high-level executives.
“The Twitter Files, Part One: How and Why Twitter Blocked the Hunter Biden Laptop Story
“On October 14, 2020, the New York Post published BIDEN SECRET EMAILS, an expose based on the contents of Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop:
“Twitter took extraordinary steps to suppress the story, removing links and posting warnings that it may be “unsafe.” They even blocked its transmission via direct message, a tool hitherto reserved for extreme cases, e.g. child pornography.
“White House spokeswoman Kaleigh McEnany was locked out of her account for tweeting about the story, prompting a furious letter from Trump campaign staffer Mike Hahn, who seethed: ‘At least pretend to care for the next 20 days.‘
“This led public policy executive Caroline Strom to send out a polite WTF query. Several employees noted that there was tension between the comms/policy teams, who had little/less control over moderation, and the safety/trust teams:
“Strom’s note returned the answer that the laptop story had been removed for violation of the company’s ‘hacked materials’ policy: Distribution of hacked material policy (archive.org)
“Although several sources recalled hearing about a “general” warning from federal law enforcement that summer about possible foreign hacks, there’s no evidence – that I’ve seen – of any government involvement in the laptop story. In fact, that might have been the problem…
“The decision was made at the highest levels of the company, but without the knowledge of CEO Jack Dorsey, with former head of legal, policy and trust Vijaya Gadde playing a key role.
“‘They just freelanced it,’ is how one former employee characterized the decision. ‘Hacking was the excuse, but within a few hours, pretty much everyone realized that wasn’t going to hold. But no one had the guts to reverse it.’
“You can see the confusion in the following lengthy exchange, which ends up including Gadde and former Trust and safety chief Yoel Roth. Comms official Trenton Kennedy writes, ‘I’m struggling to understand the policy basis for marking this as unsafe:’
“By this point ‘everyone knew this was fucked,’ said one former employee, but the response was essentially to err on the side of… continuing to err.’
“Former VP of Global Comms Brandon Borrman asks, ‘Can we truthfully claim that this is part of the policy?’
“To which former Deputy General Counsel Jim Baker again seems to advise staying the non-course, because ‘caution is warranted:’
“A fundamental problem with tech companies and content moderation: many people in charge of speech know/care little about speech, and have to be told the basics by outsiders. To wit:
“In one humorous exchange on day 1, Democratic congressman Ro Khanna reaches out to Gadde to gently suggest she hop on the phone to talk about the ‘backlash re speech.’ Khanna was the only Democratic official I could find in the files who expressed concern.
“Gadde replies quickly, immediately diving into the weeds of Twitter policy, unaware Khanna is more worried about the Bill of Rights:
“Khanna tries to reroute the conversation to the First Amendment, mention of which is generally hard to find in the files:
“Within a day, head of Public Policy Lauren Culbertson receives a ghastly letter/report from Carl Szabo of the research firm NetChoice, which had already polled 12 members of congress – 9 Rs and 3 Democrats, from ‘the House Judiciary Committee to Rep. Judy Chu’s office.’
“NetChoice lets Twitter know a “blood bath” awaits in upcoming Hill hearings, with members saying it’s a ‘tipping point,’ complaining tech has ‘grown so big that they can’t even regulate themselves, so government may need to intervene.‘
“Szabo reports to Twitter that some Hill figures are characterizing the laptop story as ‘tech’s Access Hollywood moment:’
“THE FIRST AMENDMENT ISN’T ABSOLUTE
Szabo’s letter contains chilling passages relaying Democratic lawmakers’ attitudes. They want “more” moderation, and as for the Bill of Rights, it’s ‘not absolute‘
“There are multiple instances in the files of Dorsey intervening to question suspensions and other moderation actions, for accounts across the political spectrum.
“The problem with the ‘hacked materials’ ruling, several sources said, was that this normally required an official/law enforcement finding of a hack. But such a finding never appears throughout what one executive describes as a ‘whirlwind’ 24-hour, company-wide mess.
Taibbi concludes this installment of what he calls the “Twitter Files” with the subsequent tweet, “much more to come, including answers to questions about issues like shadow-banning, boosting, follower count, the fate of various individual accounts, and more.” He added that the issues are not limited to the political right.
After Taibbi’s last Twitter File tweet Elon Musk tweeted to “tune in for Episode 2 of the Twitter Files tomorrow”. Musk since then has tweeted that the next revelation will be released in the a few days.
Looks like we will need another day or so
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 4, 2022
Author: Kienan Briscoe
3 Responses
I’m saddened to see how unmoral society has become. Rather than grow up we’ve taken steps to destroy ourselves in every way. It is disheartening to see American’s at odds with one another. I’m also saddened by the lack of trust I now feel toward my government, my doctors and fellow beings. We’ve allowed this beautiful nation to devour itself and we will pay the price. I’m so sad for future generations. They will never know the beauty of simpler times. Kids could be kids and not placed into an adult takeover by playing manipulative games. I’ve already been cancelled on other posts. We will see if this one makes it. I’m sad that in a country that stood for freedom now silences our rights to free speech. If others can post things I don’t like why is that then ok. No one should have the power to deplatform anyone. Ultimately this turns in to dictatorship not freedom.
I’m saddened to see how unmoral society has become. Rather than grow up we’ve taken steps to destroy ourselves in every way. It is disheartening to see American’s at odds with one another. I’m also saddened by the lack of trust I now feel toward my government, my doctors and fellow beings. We’ve allowed this beautiful nation to devour itself and we will pay the price. I’m so sad for future generations. They will never know the beauty of simpler times. Kids could be kids and not placed into an adult takeover by playing manipulative games. I’ve already been cancelled on other posts. We will see if this one makes it. I’m sad that in a country that stood for freedom now silences our rights to free speech. If others can post things I don’t like why is that then ok. No one should have the power to deplatform anyone. Ultimately this turns in to dictatorship not freedom.