Firearm professionals speak about legislation banning high-capacity magazines

OLYMPIA, Wash., February 27, 2022 – In an effort to tackle gun violence and strengthen public safety, the state Senate passed legislationSB5078, Feb. 9 that bans the sale of high-capacity magazines – anything over 10 rounds – but doesn’t prohibit the use of high-capacity firearms already in possession.

Marko Liias
Marko Liias (D-Everett)

“High-capacity magazines make it easy for shooters to inflict maximum damage by allowing more shots to be fired without needing to pause to reload. Because of this we see these accessories favored by mass shooters,” said Sen. Marko Liias (D-Everett), prime sponsor of the legislation.

Liias said an analysis by Boston University’s Michael Siegal showed the single best predictor of mass shooting rates is whether a state allows for the sale of high-capacity magazine weapons. He said that in the past 50 years, large-capacity magazines have been used in about 75% of gun massacres with 10 or more deaths, and 100% of shootings with more than 20 deaths.

The bill was approved by the Senate on a party line vote, with all Republicans members voting no.

“This is a serious bill that will jeopardize the safety of Washingtonians,” said Sen. Phil Fortunato (R-Auburn). “This is not about providing safety for children. This is putting in jeopardy the lives of law-abiding citizens, especially women.”

Those opposed questioned the constitutionality of the bill.

“Constitutionally, it’s in violation of the 2nd Amendment that we all swore an oath to, and it’s a violation of the state constitution,” said Sen. Keith Wagoner (R-Sedro-Woolley). “It’s not the size of a magazine or the firearm, it’s how it’s used, and there’s a clear distinction there.”

But Democrat legislators state that if this bill results in a shooter pausing to reload, lives can be saved.

“When I look into the eyes of those parents who lost their children in these types of events, there is something empty there. There’s something vacant that I don’t think any of us should have to experience,” said Sen. David Frock (D-Seattle).

The bill, now in the House, is being reviewed by the Rules Committee.

A companion bill, HB1164, was also introduced in the House on January 10, addressing firearm safety. It has yet to pass committee.

Opinion from an Edmonds resident who sued and won a gun lawsuit

The Lynnwood Times reached out to Brett Bass of Forefront Suicide Prevention and firearms safety instructor, to get his opinion on whether this new legislation could potentially hold legal repercussions.

“I haven’t spoken with Alan Gottlieb – Executive Vice President of the Second Amendment Foundation – as yet, but I think it’s sort of a yes-and-no situation,” Bass told the Lynnwood Times.

Brett bass
Jennifer Stuber from www.inthefirefront.org in the panel of experts. Brett Bass is at the far right of the photo. Source: Brett Bass.

Bass highlighted that while he is not an attorney, he holds the suspicion that if SB-5078 passes out of the House and is signed into law by Governor Jay Inslee, it could face legal challenges.

“That’s the ‘yes’ part. The ‘no’ part is that there are already two magazine ban cases that are awaiting consideration for writ of certiorari at the U.S. Supreme Court,” Bass said.

Bass used the example of the case Duncan v. Bonta, which has passed from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, and Bianchi v. Frosh in Maryland, a state which has a law with a magazine prohibition that has also advanced to the U.S. Supreme Court.

A subsequent challenge such as one to a potential Washington prohibition would likely be held until the Supreme Court had delivered a ruling in one or the other two cases. An additional lawsuit working its way to the U.S. Supreme Court would potentially add additional incentive for the high court to take up one or both cases, added Bass.

At the crux of the issue is the matter of lower courts failing to apply the appropriate degree of scrutiny to firearms cases.

In the Heller and McDonald decisions, the Supreme Court applied a ‘text, history, and tradition’ test to address the issue of 2nd Amendment constitutionality. In federal appellate court findings that have upheld various challenged firearms restrictions, judges have ignored the test standards set forth by the Supreme Court by using either ‘interest balancing’ considerations or ‘intermediate scrutiny’ for constitutional veracity.

According to Bass it is very likely that applying the appropriate ‘strict scrutiny’ or ‘text, history, and tradition’ tests to ascertain those restrictions do not infringe on firearms that are, “…in common use…for lawful purposes…” (as clearly established in Heller) will overturn restrictions such as this one.

Judge Benitez from the U.S. District Court of Southern California applied these standards to the magazine prohibition in his state last year.

Opinion from Pink Pistols Gun Rights Group

Sharyn Hinchcliffe, Administrator of Seattle-Tacoma chapter of Pink Pistols, a LGBTQ gun rights organization, told the Lynnwood Times that gun control has been used, historically, to suppress minority and marginalized communities and this new legislation is no different.

The Sullivan Act of 1911 out of New York City, for example, which targeted ethnic minorities who recently immigrated from Ireland and Italy, and the Black population coming up from the South, and is still used to prosecute individuals to this day.

“These bills will be enforced disproportionately in marginalized ethnic communities. They will be enforced in communities that already have contentious relationships with law enforcement and this is going to end up with innocent Washington residents being harmed,” Hinchcliffe said.

Pink Pistols has led protests against the new bills, including a recent protest at the state capitol building in Olympia and working with the Washington State Civil Rights Association and Gun Rights Coalition to provide education to legislators about firearms.

Hinchcliffe stated that Attorney General Bob Ferguson’s classification of these magazines as “high-capacity” is misleading and that they are “standard capacity.” She used the example of manufacturers having to create new SKU numbers for “capacity limited” magazines following New York, New Jersey, and California’s similar legislation to indicate that they are not standard.

The Ruger 1022 is an example of a firearm with a standard magazine capacity of 10 rounds, the model magazine for the bills. However, for a Glock 19, which is a commonly used firearm, the standard magazine capacity is 15 to 19 rounds, depending on model. For AR-15 style rifles, the standard magazine is 30 rounds.

“To say that a 30-round magazine is high capacity is a false framing by the attorney general and by the legislatures who are pushing this bill,” Hinchcliffe said.

Gun control, in general, Hinchliffe says, is an ongoing issue that infringes on the public’s right and ability to protect themselves.

“Women have been killed waiting for police, and waiting for permission from their local agency to purchase a firearm against their abuser,” Hinchcliffe said. “I know members of the LGBTQ community here in Western Washington who have been brutally assaulted, physically attacked, beaten and kicked and the only way to stop somebody is be armed.”

Hinchcliffe said it is a common for anti-gun activists to say just call the police but police have no obligation or duty to respond. A recent example she provided was the stabbing of a young woman at the Seattle Center in which the attacker was stopped by a Washington state concealed pistol license holder.

“We can’t expect the police to be there anymore. We never could. If you get a response, you’re looking at 30 minutes or longer…it takes seven minutes to bleed out,” Hinchcliffe said.

In the Bowers v. DeVito decision of 1982, the U.S. Court of Appeal 7th Circuit held “there is no constitutional right to be protected by the state against being murdered by criminals or mad men. It is monstrous that the state fails to protect against such predators, but it does not violate the due process clause of the 14th Amendment or presuppose any other provision of the constitution. The constitution is the charter of negative liberties that tells the state to let the people alone. It does not require the Federal Government or the state to provide services even so elementary as maintaining law and order.”

“It really goes to show what we can and can’t expect from our government,” Hinchcliffe said. This decision, Hinchcliffe stated, indicates how nearly every lawsuit against law enforcement has failed.

Kienan Briscoe

Michael Kienan Briscoe (referred to by his middle name 'Kienan') has a BA in Journalism from Arizona State University and has worked as a freelancer for a variety of publications and organizations throughout New York City and Seattle. Journalism, to him, is one of the most important public tools to ensure an educated and aware society of events surrounding them. When he is not reporting he enjoys writing fiction and poetry, playing guitar, reading classic literature, and getting outdoors. He lives in Seattle with his two dogs.

Kienan Briscoe has 236 posts and counting. See all posts by Kienan Briscoe

4 thoughts on “Firearm professionals speak about legislation banning high-capacity magazines

  • March 2, 2022 at 8:15 PM
    Permalink

    Sen. Marko Liias need study more on the Washington State Constitution “Article 1, Section 24: RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS. The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state, shall not be impaired, but nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing
    individuals or corporations to organize, maintain or employ an armed
    body of men.”
    Marko Liias is in direct violation of the Washington State Constitution that was in place after semi-automatic firearms were developed in 1885. Washington became a state on Nov. 11, 1889. Marko Liias swore an oath to protect the Washington State Constitution and with his actions is clearly not following his Oath

    Reply
  • February 28, 2022 at 10:10 AM
    Permalink

    I would find these politicians that haven’t the first clue about firearms amusing if they weren’t seriously treading on our constitutional rights. First rule is count your rounds, it becomes a habit I was taught in the military and in law enforcement. 20 rounds? Count 19 rounds and then change mags so you don’t have to hit your holding open/action release. Fewer rounds are easier to count. Time and time again demonstration have been made to show the fallacy of these so called laws. It doesn’t work, it’s inane and idiotic to expect some sort of positive result from this. Again, politicians and anti gunners thinking they are doing something, but like most gun laws they are simply a placebo for the uneducated and ignorant.

    Reply
  • February 28, 2022 at 8:22 AM
    Permalink

    Liias, is clearly an idiot. He cites a “triple” shooting as reason to ban high capacity magazines. It won’t stop any violence!!!
    Someone that knows how to use a gun, even with a seven round magazine can do a large amount of destruction!!! What we should be doing is bringing back mental institutions, and upgrading our prisons, that combined with incarcerating and keeping the people that should be off the streets where they belong. For all the rabid anti-gun nuts. Your dream of a mostly gun free zone exists, it’s called prison, there only specific guards have guns, however this “gun free utopia”
    That some believe will rid us of violence, in prison people without guns still find a way to kill each other, It’s not the guns….. a gun is an inanimate object, it doesn’t think for itself, has zero emotion, and dose not posses someone to act in a heinous manner. The politicians are lying to you, they pull your strings and get you to vote on an emotional level, don’t like guns, they scare you…… don’t own one!!! But infringing on others who can responsibly handle a firearm is BS!!!! Truth is, responsible gun owners may just be the ones that save you from a mass shooting. Having a high capacity magazine just allows a better chance of stopping the evil among us.
    Keep this in mind, this law they are trying to push, there is already a prolific amount of high capacity magazines out there, this law will not impact those already out there, if you don’t like being lied to…… stand up and tell these idiots pushing this narrative, 1. lock up the criminals, 2. Build mental health facilities, 3. Restore power to the police and quit hamstringing their efforts.
    Also the same people pushing this ban…. Are the same people currently in power….. so if you like high crime, high taxes, homeless encampments everywhere, illicit drugs proliferating your community’s, gang violence…… just keep voting for these idiots.
    FYI if your car is stolen and the police see it, they are NOT allowed to pursue.
    Criminals have the upper hand, it seems like the want to make it easier for them to stay on top.
    My father served a local department as a police officer, and a detective, I have a much different perspective of things, what I have seen in my youth, and what I see now is alarming. Wake up people!!!!

    Reply
  • February 27, 2022 at 11:10 PM
    Permalink

    The majority of shootings involve “high capacity” magazines because the majority of magazines carry more than 10 rounds.

    This should never make it to federal court; the rules committee should squash this bill because it violates Section 24 of Article I of The Constitution of the State of Washington, which states that the right to bear arms in defense of oneself or the state “shall not be impaired,” and both sides agree a limited capacity magazine represents an impairment.

    Liias has cited the tragic triple homicide at the Harbour Pointe house party a few years ago as motivation for this bill. However, since neighbors reported hearing 10 to 12 shots, the shooter could have used a single 10-round magazine (plus one in the chamber) to fire 11 shots.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.